News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

The Maga court: inside Donald Trump’s new White House
John Thune elected Senate majority leader in rebuke to Trump allies
What’s behind Salesforce’s record highs — plus, a possible stock to buy after this week’s earnings
Cumulative traffic to exchanges increased by 8% in October — report
Bitcoin hits record high as Trump edges closer to full control of Congress